AI Blue · Module 3 · The Blue Team's AI Team

The Analyst's Own Use of AI: Querying, Drafting and Summarising in Modes 1 to 3

The lesson treats the analyst's own use of conversational assistants, embedded assistants and agentic work tools, which touches all five blue team functions. Participants classify data into four classes and restrict routes by class, learn what never goes to any assistant, record AI use as a pointer in the case record, hold the line between assistance and delegation, respond to shadow AI and agree the logging terms with employee representatives.

Lesson 12 of 28Chapter 1275 minutes

Read the chapterThe whitepaperThe slides

All courses / AI Blue / Module 3 / Chapter 12

Learning objectives

After the lesson the participant can:

Key concepts

Route
A pairing of a tool, a mode and a hosting arrangement. The policy states, per data class, which routes are allowed and the highest degree of delegation permitted on each, and the tooling enforces it.
AI-use record
A pointer in the case record, not a transcript: which step used an assistant, by which route and mode, for which data class and purpose, how the output was used and what it was checked against.
Assistance versus delegation
Assistance means the analyst decides what is asked, reads the output in full, owns the result and takes every action. Anything that acts on standing authority is an agent with a mandate.
Shadow AI
The use of AI tools the organisation has not approved or does not know about. The remedy is a better approved route, a fast exception path and a culture in which disclosure is a safe act.
Unassisted share
The share of cases worked without an assistant so that skill survives: by default one case in five, and one in two for analysts in their first six months; one in ten at Nordvik Region.

Interactive exercises

Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.

Interactive exercise 1 · Sort

Which route may this take?

Sort each piece of material by where the chapter's routing rules allow an analyst to send it.

Interactive exercise 2 · Scenario

An analyst owns up

Apply the chapter's response to shadow AI.

Teaching plan

10 minTeacher walks through a shift at the Polish service centre using the table of activities, modes, data and characteristic failures.
15 minRouting drill: participants sort ten data fragments into the four classes and choose the permitted route under AIUP-HM-SOC-01.
10 minDiscussion of the never-paste list and of data minimisation: state the question first and paste the smallest fragment that answers it.
30 minExercise: groups draft a one-page acceptable-use sheet for their own SOC or for Nordvik Region's six analysts.
10 minPlenary on the four terms of an agreement on the AI-use log: purpose, granularity, reporting and change.

Discussion

  1. The approved assistant may refuse anything that looks like a security question. What would make the approved route the best one for security work in your organisation?
  2. A log entry of 'used as drafted' is acceptable only with a recorded check. What counts as a sufficient check for a ticket summary, and what for a drafted query?
  3. The AI-use log protects the analyst as well as the organisation. Under what terms would analysts in your team see it that way?

Written exercise

Exercise · 30 minutes

A one-page acceptable-use sheet for analysts

Follow the five steps of the practical guide. Fix the four data classes and name the data that is always restricted: alert content, case content, personal data and evidence. Mark each available route as allowed or not allowed per class, including a separate line for embedded assistants in the SIEM or endpoint console. Write the never-paste list in no more than eight lines. State the record: what the case tool captures, what the analyst adds, how long prompts are kept and that no individual measure is reported. State the unassisted share, name the exception route and put the review date on the page. For Nordvik Region, keep the embedded assistant disabled as the chapter describes.

Deliverable: A one-page sheet with a class-by-route table, the never-paste list, recording rules, the unassisted share, the exception route and a review date.

Self-test

Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.

  1. Why do the safeguards for Modes 1 to 3 rest on the analyst's discipline and the tooling around it?

    Show the answer

    C. Because in these modes the AI acts with the analyst's own identity and permissions
    In Modes 1 to 3 the AI borrows the analyst's identity, so governance is about the analyst's use: classification, routes restricted by class and enforcement in the case tool and gateway.

  2. Which of the following goes to no assistant, whatever the route?

    Show the answer

    A. Credentials and secrets, including those found inside evidence
    The never-paste list starts with credentials and secrets: a credential found in a log is a finding to report and rotate, not a string to explain to an assistant.

  3. A Mode 3 work tool runs a command that changes an endpoint. How does the chapter classify this?

    Show the answer

    D. As B4 Respond, which falls under the playbook manifests of Chapter 10
    Read-only queries are within the policy, but a state-changing command is response work and falls under the playbook manifests; the policy's action list for the work tool excludes anything that writes.