AI Blue · Module 4 · The Team in the Organisation

Decision Rights and Escalation: Who May Contain, Isolate and Disclose

The lesson assigns the decisions around a response, for B3 Investigate and B4 Respond: who may isolate a production system, disable an account, take a service offline, notify a regulator or affected people, refuse a ransom or stop an agent, and how fast. Participants work with five response tiers, a table of ten decisions, the design of stop and disclosure rights, the escalation packet for agents, and a decision-rights file that holds across several legal regimes.

Lesson 18 of 28Chapter 18120 minutes

Read the chapterThe whitepaperThe slides

All courses / AI Blue / Module 4 / Chapter 18

Learning objectives

After the lesson the participant can:

Key concepts

Decision right
A requirement with a holder, a deputy and a second deputy, a response time, an evidence standard and a record. It is set from the speed of the threat and the shortest applicable clock.
Response tiers
Five tiers decide in seconds to hours: playbook, on-call, incident commander, executive and management body. The lowest tier that can decide with the evidence decides, and the management body approves the file in advance.
Timeout rule
A page not acknowledged within the response time goes to the deputy by an automatic timer, never by a person remembering.
Escalation packet
A structured packet, not a message: the subject, the proposed action and its class, the evidence with data paths marked independent or shared, the evidence pointing the other way, the cost of waiting, the status of the clocks and the holder.
Three disclosure decisions
The file separates classification of the event, the decision to notify and the approval of the text. AI may propose classification and draft at Level 1 Assisted; a named executive holds the decision.

Interactive exercises

Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.

Interactive exercise 1 · Put in order

The response tiers

Put the five response tiers in order, from the tier that decides in seconds to the one that approves in advance.

Interactive exercise 2 · Scenario

A production host and an unreachable holder

Apply the decision-rights file and its timeout rule to a night at Hansa Mutual.

Teaching plan

15 minTeacher replays the night of 2027-04-12, where three decisions were taken within about eight minutes, and names the three failures that recur when rights are not assigned.
20 minPresentation and questions on the five response tiers and the ten decisions D1 to D10 with classes, holders and default times.
15 minReading of DRF-HM-SOC-01 and the tabletop TTX-HM-2027-Q3-01: participants explain why D7 took 51 minutes against a target of 30.
50 minExercise: groups complete a decision-rights table and run a short tabletop with an injected scenario and real paging.
20 minDebrief on stop rights, the line between D3 and D5 for named persons, and how the group decides whether and when while entities file.

Discussion

  1. A stop needs one holder and no justification before it takes effect, and an unnecessary stop costs the organisation and not the individual. What would have to change in your culture for people to use that right?
  2. Revoking a session is reversible containment of a credential, while disabling an account decides about a person's access to work. Where exactly would you draw that line in your identity system?
  3. The management body approves the file in advance and is informed; it does not sit in the incident path. How does that square with its accountability under NIS 2 Article 20 and DORA Article 5?

Written exercise

Exercise · 50 minutes

A decision-rights table tested in a tabletop

Start from the ten decisions D1 to D10 of the chapter. For your organisation, or for Nordvik Region with its named on-call manager and regional director, assign each decision its action class and ceiling, one holder by role, a deputy and a second deputy, and a response time worked back from the shortest clock, using 5, 10, 30, 120 and 240 minutes as defaults. Write the evidence standard and the inform list for D4, D5 and D7, and the timeout rule. Then run a tabletop: inject a scenario at a minute the holders do not know, page the holders for D4 and D7, and measure time to acknowledge and time to decide. File every miss as a finding with an owner and a re-test date.

Deliverable: A decision-rights table for ten decisions and a tabletop result with measured times for at least two decisions and findings for each miss.

Self-test

Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.

  1. Who is the default holder of decision D5, disabling a staff account, and within what time?

    Show the answer

    C. The incident commander, within 10 minutes
    D5 is an AC-3 action held by the incident commander with a 10-minute response time; the line manager and SOC lead are told. Where conduct is suspected, HR and the works agreement come first.

  2. What did Hansa Mutual's tabletop on decision D7 measure against its targets?

    Show the answer

    D. Acknowledgement after 18 minutes against a target of 10, and a decision after 51 minutes against 30
    The tabletop showed what a table does not: the holder acknowledged in 18 minutes and decided in 51. The faults found were in plumbing and delegation, not in judgement, and the file was amended.

  3. Under the chapter's rules, what moves an unanswered page to the deputy?

    Show the answer

    A. An automatic timer when the response time passes without acknowledgement
    The timeout rule sends an unacknowledged page to the deputy by an automatic timer, never by a person remembering.