All courses / AI Boss / Module 1 / Chapter 2
Learning objectives
After the lesson the participant can:
- Define each of the five management functions and the boundary that separates it from its neighbours.
- Explain why the functions differ in reversibility, the person's stake and governing law.
- Identify the overlaps by which a system built for one function acts on another.
- Draft a function map for one team that records performers, systems, modes, degrees and deciders.
Key concepts
- M3 Consequence defined by effect
- M3 Consequence begins wherever the person's legal or economic position changes. It is defined by that effect, not by the label of the decision: an allocation rule that systematically gives one group fewer hours is a consequence decision.
- Boundary between M2 and M4
- Drawn by purpose. Feedback meant to improve the person is M4 Development; a rating used to compare people is M2 Evaluation. Kluger and DeNisi found that more than a third of feedback interventions reduced performance.
- Evaluation feeds consequence
- A throughput figure or sales score becomes an input to pay or dismissal, sometimes years after it was introduced for planning. The protection is to treat a new use of an existing figure as a change that needs its own decision.
- Function map
- A record, for one team, of who performs each management function today and which AI systems touch which functions, at which mode and degree, and who decided that degree. It is a file in version control, readable by the people it concerns.
- Care as a relationship
- Part of M5 Care is performed through attention, such as noticing that a colleague now finishes her round late every day. No dashboard records it, and when a system takes over the routes the opportunity to notice moves with it.
Interactive exercises
Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.
Interactive exercise 1 · Sort
Which management function is it?
Sort each activity under the management function to which Chapter 2 assigns it. Use the chapter's boundaries: a function is set by the effect on the person.
Interactive exercise 2 · Scenario
A dashboard nobody decided on
Apply the chapter's practical guide for mapping a team's management functions to the situation below.
Teaching plan
| 15 min | The teacher contrasts what managers were said to do (Fayol, Drucker) with what they were observed to do (Mintzberg, Hill) and what the research on algorithmic management adds. |
| 15 min | Presentation of the five functions with definitions and boundaries, then the table of reversibility, stake and governing law; participants place three everyday decisions on the functions. |
| 10 min | Group reading of the table of who performs each function in the hospital ward, the Strandvik home-care unit and the Hamburg claims team. |
| 25 min | Exercise: participants draft a function map for one team, following the chapter's practical guide and the worked example FMAP-NR-STR-01. |
| 10 min | Debrief: each group names one system that reaches a function at a degree nobody decided, and one informal performer the organisation chart does not show. |
Discussion
- The chapter says the five functions describe what reaches the person managed, whereas Fayol and Drucker describe the organisation's need. What does a split made from the managed person's side reveal that the classical one hides?
- M4 Development is governed mostly by collective agreements and practice. Why does the chapter treat that gap as a reason for care and not as freedom to delegate?
- At Strandvik the largest finding is a dashboard used at a degree not yet decided. How would such a finding be received in your organisation, and who would own the answer?
Written exercise
Exercise · 25 minutes
A function map for one team
Using FMAP-NR-STR-01 as the model, draft a function map for one team: either the Hamburg claims team as the chapter describes it, or a team in your own organisation. For each of the five functions list the decisions of a normal month, who performs each and who has the last word. List every system whose output is used in those decisions, including Mode 0 features and Mode 2 assistants. For each system record every function its output reaches, its mode, its degree per function and who decided that degree, or not decided. Mark the overlaps that apply and name a human decider for every M3 Consequence entry.
Deliverable: A function map with named performers for all five functions, each system with mode, degree and decider, the overlaps marked, open questions listed and a review date within 12 months.
Self-test
Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.
Average visit time across a route is information for planning. According to the chapter, when does the same figure become M2 Evaluation?
Show the answer
A. When it is computed per person and visible to the manager, whether or not anyone calls it evaluation
The boundary that matters most in M2 Evaluation is between measuring the work and judging the person; the per-person figure visible to the manager is evaluation regardless of its label.Which functions does the chapter say Annex III, point 4(b), of the AI Act reaches into, and which does it not reach?
Show the answer
C. It reaches M1, M2 and M3, but not development or care
Point 4(b) covers decisions on terms of work, promotion or termination, task allocation based on behaviour or traits, and monitoring and evaluating performance, so it reaches M1, M2 and M3 but not M4 Development or M5 Care.In the worked example FMAP-NR-STR-01, why do ShiftWise open-shift offers also reach M3 Consequence?
Show the answer
D. Because offered hours determine pay for staff who depend on extra shifts
The map notes that offered hours determine pay; for an hourly care assistant paid by the shifts offered, the allocation of open shifts is partly an M3 decision, and the function map must say so.