AI Boss · Module 6 · Designing the Accountable AI Boss

Management Decisions as Records: Decision Records and the Delegation Register

The lesson supplies the two artefacts on which Part VI rests. Participants learn the fields of the Management Decision Record, the four-part rule for when one is required, how records arise from system events and the decider's action, and how a schema makes the record a condition of the decision. They study the delegation register with its sums, reversibility tests and freeze, the rules on privacy and access, and the answer to open question Q3: one record, four readers.

Lesson 25 of 33Chapter 25105 minutes

Read the chapterThe whitepaperThe slides

All courses / AI Boss / Module 6 / Chapter 25

Learning objectives

After the lesson the participant can:

Key concepts

Management Decision Record
A short, numbered, immutable record of one management decision about one or more people that an AI system made or shaped: what the system proposed, who decided, why, what the person was told and how to contest it.
Record by operation
The record is generated from the system's events, which supply proposal, inputs, version and flags, and from the decider's action, which supplies the decision and reasons. A record that fails validation holds the decision.
Reversibility test
A test of whether a unit could perform one function without the system for a defined period, and whether its managers still can. The result is passed, passed with conditions or failed.
Freeze
Where a reversibility test fails or passes only with conditions, further delegation in that function and team is frozen until the conditions are met. The system keeps running at the agreed degree; the next step stops.
One record, four readers
The worker gets the explanation and appeal route, the representatives an aggregate, a court a record made at the time by the person who decided, and a supervisory authority the evidence of demonstrable compliance.

Interactive exercises

Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.

Interactive exercise 1 · Put in order

The life of a Management Decision Record

Put the stages in the life of a Management Decision Record in order, from the system's proposal to a correction after a contest.

Interactive exercise 2 · Match

The record set

Match each artefact identifier from the chapter's record set with what the artefact records.

Teaching plan

15 minThe teacher places the Management Decision Record beside the Architecture Decision Record and the AI Decision Record and draws out the four differences that follow from its being about a person.
20 minField-by-field reading of MDR-NR-0001; participants identify the three fields that carry most weight and apply the four-part rule to ten example decisions.
20 minPresentation of the delegation register and the reversibility tests RVT-NR-ROS-2027-01 and RVT-HM-CTA-2027-01, with what each found and froze.
15 minDiscussion of minimisation, retention, public access, and access for the decider and the representatives.
35 minExercise: groups write one Management Decision Record and the four views of it, then design a reversibility test for the system behind it.

Discussion

  1. The chapter says a reason the system generated and the decider accepted is the system's reason. How should a decision screen be designed so that the reasons are the decider's own?
  2. A store of decision records also records how each manager decided, how quickly and how often against the system. What uses of it should be agreed, and which excluded?
  3. Nordvik's reversibility test found that the fallback had fallen behind the system it replaces. What would such a test find in a unit you know?

Written exercise

Exercise · 35 minutes

One record, four views

Choose one decision that AI made or shaped about a person: an approved roster, an overridden allocation, a shortlist or a pay proposal, at Nordvik Region, Hansa Mutual or your own organisation. Write its Management Decision Record with the field groups of the chapter: identity, decision class and function, person by pseudonymous reference, system and proposal, degree of delegation, human decider, changes and reasons in the decider's words, information given, contest route and retention rule, with no health data. Then write in two sentences each what the worker, the representatives, a court and a supervisory authority would read from it. Finish with a reversibility test for the system: scenario, period and what a pass would require.

Deliverable: A Management Decision Record in the form of MDR-NR-0001, four short reader views and a one-paragraph reversibility test design.

Self-test

Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.

  1. Which of these does the chapter's four-part rule require a Management Decision Record for, without sampling?

    Show the answer

    D. Every M3 Consequence decision that AI shaped
    Each consequence decision can be contested individually, so every one receives a record. M1 Direction and M2 Evaluation decisions are sampled, apart from those the profile names and those that are contested.

  2. What did Nordvik Region's reversibility test RVT-NR-ROS-2027-01 freeze?

    Show the answer

    A. Any new ShiftWise action class, including the shift-swap feature, until the conditions are met
    The test passed with conditions: the deputy had never planned a route by hand and competence rules existed only inside the product. A freeze is not a stop; the system runs at the agreed degree while further delegation waits.

  3. Why does MDR-HM-0001 state that the handler worked an agreed reduced schedule, without saying why?

    Show the answer

    C. Because the record holds no health data: the reason for the decision is the schedule, not its cause
    Minimisation applies to the record: it uses pseudonymous references and holds no health data even where health was the reason, because the record travels to readers who should not see it.