AI Threat · Module 2 · The Human Mind

Artificial Companions, Loneliness and Mental Health

The lesson tests T9 The pleasure machine in its most intimate form. With care for a subject that touches self-harm, participants learn what the four-week controlled study found and did not find, what the Replika order established and what the Character.AI complaint alleges, why age assurance and crisis handover are the two missing safeguards, and how limits, honesty and routes to human help are designed. They write a safeguarding policy for a public-facing assistant.

Lesson 9 of 35Chapter 975 minutes

Read the chapterThe whitepaperThe slides

All courses / AI Threat / Module 2 / Chapter 9

Learning objectives

After the lesson the participant can:

Key concepts

Four patterns of use
Occasional use, regular companionship, heavy emotional reliance, and dependence and crisis. Risk concentrates in heavy, emotionally reliant use; each pattern has its safeguard, from honest disclosure to distress detection and handover to a human.
Age assurance
Knowing approximately who the user is. No provision prescribes a method, so a provider or deployer must show what it did, proportionate to the risk, and design on the assumption that the measure will sometimes fail.
Crisis handover
On signals of distress the system stops generating ordinary answers, shows a fixed clinician-written message with emergency contacts, offers a staffed, timed and tested route to a human, and never discusses methods of self-harm.
Designing for wellbeing
Three groups of design choices: limits (no engagement targets, session limits, no simulated longing), honesty (disclosure, no claimed feelings or credentials) and routes to human help with a named owner and a test after every change.

Interactive exercises

Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.

Interactive exercise 1 · Match

Patterns of use and their safeguards

Risk concentrates in heavy, emotionally reliant use. Match each pattern of use to the safeguard the chapter assigns to it.

Interactive exercise 2 · Scenario

A companion device for isolated residents

Apply the practical guide on whether an AI companion belongs in a care setting.

Teaching plan

10 minThe teacher opens with the chapter's note on support lines, then presents Her, the companions of 2026 and the reasons people give for using them, stated without condescension.
15 minReview the controlled study and its limits, then the Replika order and the Character.AI litigation; participants mark each statement as finding, allegation or interpretation.
12 minWalk through age assurance, crisis handling and designing for wellbeing using Table 9.1; stage the debate in four steps.
28 minExercise in groups: write a safeguarding policy for a public-facing assistant, modelled on SG-NR-CSA-01, and plan the first handover drill.
10 minClose with the verdict, the way the trope misleads about intent, and how Nordvik and Hansa meet the risk differently.

Discussion

  1. The case for calm asks that policy not be written as though every user were a child in crisis. How can safeguards protect the people most at risk without removing a comfort from those it harms no one to have?
  2. The chapter calls an untested route to a human a declaration, not a design. What would a credible test of the handover look like out of hours in your organisation?
  3. Fiction's pleasure machine pacifies by intent, whereas the documented harm arises from incentives, approval-based training and missing safeguards. Why does that difference matter for who can act?

Written exercise

Exercise · 28 minutes

A safeguarding policy for a public-facing assistant

Take an assistant that members of the public can write to, in your organisation or Nordvik Region's citizen-service assistant. Write a safeguarding policy with six parts: scope, including what the assistant is not for; the disclosure shown at the start and the rule on persona; design rules on engagement metrics, relationship language, memory and session length; what happens on a distress signal, in order, with staffed hours, an out-of-hours alternative and a target time to a human; what is logged on each signal; and assurance, including who holds the test set, how often the handover is drilled and which changes trigger a review. Do not describe methods of self-harm anywhere in the policy.

Deliverable: A safeguarding policy record with named owner, clinical adviser, distress procedure, handover target and drill schedule.

Self-test

Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.

  1. What did the four-week randomised study by researchers at the MIT Media Lab and OpenAI find across every modality and kind of conversation?

    Show the answer

    B. Those who used the chatbot more each day reported more loneliness and emotional dependence
    The association held across modalities, but the amount of use was not randomised, so the study shows where risk concentrates, not that companions make people lonely.

  2. What did the Italian data protection authority treat as the root failure in its 2023 order concerning Replika?

    Show the answer

    D. Missing effective age verification, with no lawful basis for processing children's data
    The Garante found no effective age verification and no lawful basis for processing children's data, showing that data protection law already reaches product design.

  3. How should the claims in the Character.AI litigation be described, following the chapter?

    Show the answer

    A. As allegations the defendants contest, not yet tested at trial
    The court allowed most claims to proceed past the preliminary stage, but nothing has been tested at trial, and the chapter stresses that suicide almost never has a single cause.