All courses / AI Developer / Module 3 / Chapter 19
Learning objectives
After the lesson the participant can:
- Classify a citizen-built tool into Tier A, B, C or D using the four tests
- Explain why the chapter prefers a register, templates and a sandbox to prohibition
- Apply promotion criteria based on Name, Understand and Revert to a tool built by a case handler
- Draft a register entry that records each criterion as met, not met or not tested
Key concepts
- Citizen developer
- An employee outside the development organisation who builds software for work, with a spreadsheet, a form or workflow builder, a low-code platform or a natural-language app builder.
- Shadow IT as a mismatch of visibility
- Not a new category of fault but tools the organisation relies on and cannot see. Discovery is by asking and by service, never by watching named individuals, with a time-limited amnesty.
- Four tiers
- Tier A personal, Tier B team, Tier C business (personal data, money, a record of the organisation, more than one unit or unattended running) and Tier D project. Any doubt moves a tool up one tier, and Tier D is not a citizen build.
- Promotion criteria
- The stewardship principle applied to the tool: Name an owner and a deputy, Understand with a one-page data flow and test cases the maker did not write, Revert with a tested switch-off and fallback. A pipeline identity promotes, never the maker.
- Build-your-own-tool register
- The list of tools that exist, with owner, data classes and a sunset date, kept in version control. A criterion is recorded as met, not met or not tested, with a date, and it expires.
Interactive exercises
Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.
Interactive exercise 1 · Sort
Which tier is this tool
Sort each citizen-built tool into the tier that the chapter's four tests give it.
Interactive exercise 2 · Put in order
From a case handler's tool to a register entry
Put these steps of the practical guide for a register entry and promotion criteria in order.
Teaching plan
| 10 min | The teacher asks who in the room has built a tool outside the development organisation, and introduces the ladder of tools and what AI changes on it. |
| 15 min | Lecture on the risks of data, access and continuity and the legal-role question, and on why bans have the weakest evidence. |
| 15 min | Sorting task: participants place ten described tools into the four tiers and argue the doubtful ones up a tier. |
| 25 min | Exercise: pairs create a register entry and promotion criteria for a tool built by a case handler. |
| 10 min | Plenary on the missing-documents tracker at Nordvik Region: why an entry that is registered and not promoted is an honest state. |
Discussion
- The sanctioned route has to be at least as good as the unsanctioned one. What would make your organisation's sanctioned route worse than a consumer tool today?
- Both organisations found that the delegation profile written for developers did not cover the people who build most often. Who are those people in your organisation?
- Sunset is a decision taken at registration, not at departure. Which tools in your unit have outlived their maker?
Written exercise
Exercise · 25 minutes
A register entry and promotion criteria
Take a tool built by a non-developer in your organisation, or the missing-documents tracker of the benefits unit at Nordvik Region. Describe the task, who uses it and the manual fallback. Classify the tier with the four tests, moving up one tier on any doubt. Name the owner and a deputy, and describe the deputy's drill: find the switch-off and explain the data flow. Record the data classes and any assistants used. Say who writes the independent test cases, who reviews access and data flow, and how the revert is tested. Record each promotion criterion as met, not met or not tested with a date, and set review and sunset dates.
Deliverable: A register entry with tier, owner, deputy, data classes, criteria marked met, not met or not tested, and review and sunset dates.
Self-test
Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.
Which tool belongs in Tier D and is therefore not a citizen build?
Show the answer
B. A workflow tool that ranks or decides about a named person
Tier D covers tools that rank or decide about a named person, are or feed a high-risk AI system, or touch a security-critical path. The chapter calls it the Level 4 prohibitions applied to a different builder.Who promotes a Tier C tool to production under the chapter's promotion criteria?
Show the answer
D. The platform pipeline, with an identity that is not the maker's
The promoting identity is not the maker. When every criterion is met, the platform pipeline promotes the tool, which is the same gate that Chapter 11 requires of a release.What is the highest degree of delegation the chapter's table allows for agentic work tools (Mode 3) in citizen building?
Show the answer
A. None: reserved to developers and the platform team under a mandate
The table gives no level for citizen builders at Mode 3. Agents that edit many components and run actions are reserved to developers and the platform team under a mandate manifest.