All courses / Tools / Module 3 / Chapter 8
Learning objectives
After the lesson the participant can:
- Map one obligation to a control, a test, an evidence item and an evidence age using a mapping tool of the chapter.
- Compare the mapping tools by what each refuses to leave out.
- Write a control catalogue entry with enforcement, evidence freshness and a test.
- Interpret a maturity result from either model of the series and state what it does not show.
Key concepts
- Assure once, comply many
- A method stated in Architecture as Code (Chapter 10): execute and evidence a control once, then map it to many frameworks. It fails when the mapping is a list of articles with no evidence beside each row.
- Regulation-to-control mapping record
- An artefact of AI Operations, family RCM: one row per control with the instruments it serves, the evidence age and review dates. Its owner is in the second line and independent of operations, and a failed test withdraws the claim.
- Control catalogue entry
- A control, family CTRL, with an owner, the obligations it serves, its enforcement, an evidence source with a freshness in days, a test and a status. The chapter's verdict: an entry without a test is a statement.
- Oversight-quality metric
- A metric, family OQM, that shows whether human oversight is real by override rate, seeded-error catch rate and review time. It is reported for groups and never to evaluate individual overseers, and three volumes define it differently.
- Maturity self-assessment
- The record of the AI Governance model: five levels from Exploring to Optimising over eight dimensions. An organisation is at a level when it meets that level's indicators and every level below; one overall level is the lowest dimension.
Interactive exercises
Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.
Interactive exercise 1 · Sort
Five families, four of them here
Sort each tool into the family in which Chapter 8 treats it.
Interactive exercise 2 · Scenario
A failed test and a mapping row
Choose what the owner of the mapping record should do, following the chapter's entry on the regulation-to-control mapping record.
Teaching plan
| 15 min | Present Figure 8.1, assure once and comply many, and the five families. Stress that laws appear only as what the tools are mapped to. |
| 20 min | Compare four mapping tools on one slide: Control Mapping Matrix, EU AI Act obligation mapping, obligation register and RCM record. Participants find what each refuses to leave out. |
| 15 min | Teach assurance and maturity: the audit test procedure TP-AI-014 on Nordvik Region's caseworker override control, the oversight-quality metric, and the two maturity models with their different scales. |
| 30 min | Exercise: participants build a mapping row and its catalogue entry for one control and a design and operating test for it. |
| 10 min | Debrief: which rows lacked an evidence age, and who independent of the control's owner could run the test. |
Discussion
- The series does not claim that holding a certificate under a standard shows that controls work. What should a board ask for instead of the certificate?
- Why is the rule that an oversight-quality metric is never used to evaluate individuals described as the condition on which employee representatives agree to it?
- The Architecture as Code model counts from Level 0 to Level 5 and the AI Governance model from 1 to 5, with different subjects. What goes wrong if a report mixes the two?
Written exercise
Exercise · 30 minutes
One control from article to evidence
Choose one control that more than one instrument or standard demands in your organisation, for example logging or human oversight, or take the caseworker override control of Nordvik Region. Write a mapping row in the style of the regulation-to-control mapping record: the instruments and articles it serves as your organisation reads them, the owner of the mapping and their independence from the function mapped, the evidence, its age and its age limit, and the result. Then write the control catalogue entry: title, owner, obligations, enforcement, evidence source, freshness in days and test. Finish with one design test and one operating-effectiveness test in the manner of the audit test procedure.
Deliverable: A mapping row, a catalogue entry and a two-part test procedure for one control, with evidence age and independent owner stated.
Self-test
Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.
What is the stated limit of the Control Mapping Matrix of Architecture as Code?
Show the answer
C. It holds clause references for each control, and not tests
The matrix is the simplest tool with the widest reach because it asks only for a table. Its limit, the chapter says, is that it holds clause references and not tests.In the maturity model of AI Governance, how is one overall level derived where one is needed?
Show the answer
B. It is the lowest level found among the eight dimensions
An organisation is at a level in a dimension when it meets that level's indicators and those of every level below, and one overall level, where needed, is the lowest dimension.What makes the regulation-to-control mapping record of AI Operations a second-line artefact?
Show the answer
D. Its owner is independent of operations
AI Operations adds that the owner of the record is independent of operations, so the mapping is itself a second-line artefact, and that a failed test withdraws the claim on its row.