All courses / AI Platform and Security / Module 6 / Chapter 25
Learning objectives
After the lesson the participant can:
- State the book's thesis on when an AI platform is under control.
- Explain the eight conclusions and the tension each acts on.
- Assess an organisation against the three stages of the capability roadmap using the test of each stage.
- Draft a first-90-days platform and security plan with workstreams, outcomes and success measures.
Key concepts
- The thesis
- An AI platform is under control when everything that shapes behaviour is codified, versioned and evaluated together, every model call and tool call passes a policy point outside the model, containment holds whatever anyone intends, and evidence comes from normal operation.
- Shared artefacts
- A few artefacts serve several conclusions at once: the gateway is routing point, policy decision point, cost meter and source of the event log; the permission manifest and the release manifest likewise carry more than one conclusion.
- Engineered trade-offs
- Four conflicts that become design decisions with a cost: speed of defence against change control, rich telemetry against storage limitation, containment against value, and routing for cost against stable evaluation.
- Capability roadmap
- Three stages stated as platform capabilities, each with a test: one control point and a working stop in months 0 to 6, replaceable and ready for high-risk duties in months 6 to 18, and evidence on every release with autonomy by exception in months 18 to 36.
- Observable and speculation
- The labels the chapter uses in its forward look to separate what can be observed today, with sources, from what the author expects. The full outlook is in AI Governance, Chapter 22.
Interactive exercises
Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.
Interactive exercise 1 · Sort
Which stage of the roadmap?
Sort each capability under the stage of the capability roadmap that requires it.
Interactive exercise 2 · Match
Four trade-offs and their reconciliation
Match each conflict between the book's conclusions with the way the chapter says the platform engineers it.
Teaching plan
| 15 min | The teacher restates the thesis and asks participants to mark, clause by clause, which is true of their own platform today. |
| 20 min | Groups each take two of the eight conclusions, name the chapters behind them, the tension they act on and the artefact that carries them, and report back. |
| 15 min | Present the four trade-offs and the three roadmap stages with their tests, and the first-90-days plan for the two organisations. |
| 30 min | Exercise: participants assess their organisation against the stage tests and write a first-90-days plan. |
| 10 min | Close with how firm the conclusions are and with the chapter's list of where to begin. |
Discussion
- Sovereignty is said to depend less on where a model was made than on how fast it can be replaced. How fast could you replace the model behind your most important AI service, and how do you know?
- A platform that does not budget for its controls will find them traded away in the first difficult quarter. Which control on your platform is unfunded?
- The chapter says that if its judgements prove wrong the timing of the roadmap changes but not its order. Which stage of the roadmap would you be tempted to skip, and what would it cost later?
Written exercise
Exercise · 30 minutes
Stage assessment and a first-90-days plan
Assess your organisation against the tests of the three roadmap stages. For Stage 1, state whether any model calls bypass the gateway, whether shared or standing credentials exist in AI workloads, and whether each acting agent has been stopped in an exercise. For Stage 2, state whether a forced model migration has been rehearsed and whether unregistered skills or connectors exist. For Stage 3, state whether an auditor could reconstruct a release and an agent permission from records alone. Then write a first-90-days plan with four workstreams, each with the usage modes it concerns, the records it refers to, an outcome that can be verified and a due day, plus two success measures.
Deliverable: A stage assessment with evidence or gap per test, and a first-90-days plan with four workstreams and two success measures.
Self-test
Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.
Why does the chapter say the inventory and every approval should name the usage mode and not the brand?
Show the answer
B. Because one vendor appears in several modes, and the mode determines what the platform must provide
The usage-mode matrix is the platform's demand forecast: the same vendor's products need different control points depending on the mode of use.How does the chapter reconcile the demand to protect within 48 hours with change management requirements that every change be reviewed?
Show the answer
D. By approving the emergency path, its canary rings and rollback in advance, making each patch a standard change
Control now has a clock, so pre-approved emergency paths are part of what control means.What is the test of Stage 1 of the capability roadmap?
Show the answer
A. No model calls outside the gateway, no standing credentials in AI workloads, and each Mode 5 agent stopped in an exercise
Stage 1 is one control point and a working stop; the other options are the tests of Stage 2 and Stage 3 or measures from another chapter.