All courses / AI Leader / Module 3 / Chapter 14
Learning objectives
After the lesson the participant can:
- State the five things a chief executive owns that cannot be delegated to a system, a committee or a deputy.
- Distinguish a thesis about what AI is for from a slogan by asking what outcome would show it false.
- Review an adoption target for evidence age and for the incentives it creates.
- Identify the five signs of executive AI theatre in a programme report.
Key concepts
- The thesis
- A short written answer, in terms of the organisation's mission, to what AI is for: which services, risks and people. It is a statement that can be wrong and says when the organisation will stop. 'We will be AI-first' is a slogan because no outcome would show it false.
- Pace set by outcome
- The chief executive sets the pace by outcome and not by use, gives every target an evidence age and writes down what would make the organisation slow down. No pace follows from the productivity studies without a local test.
- Executive AI theatre
- The book's descriptive term for announcements, dashboards and pilots that give the impression of change without changing a decision, a workflow or an outcome. Its signs are input counts, pilots that never end, unowned announcements, briefing monoculture and the disappearing sceptic.
- Recorded tiebreak
- AI crosses portfolios, so decision rights between executives are written. Where they disagree the chief executive is the tiebreaker of last resort, the tiebreak is recorded, and for strategic, structural, risk and crisis decisions the dissent is written by the person who dissents.
- The executive's own use
- What executives do with AI shapes the organisation more than what they say. The controls are that the signatory reads every draft, the secretary corrects and signs minutes, and unaided preparation once a quarter and a short log of wrong outputs keep the use honest.
Interactive exercises
Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.
Interactive exercise 1 · Match
Five signs of executive AI theatre
Match each sign of executive AI theatre to the description the chapter gives of it.
Interactive exercise 2 · Scenario
A decision that crosses six portfolios
Apply the chapter's account of decision rights between executives.
Teaching plan
| 15 min | Lecture on the five things the chief executive owns; participants rewrite a slogan about AI into a thesis that names an outcome and a stop condition. |
| 15 min | The teacher presents the evidence on pace, including the Eurostat figures for all and for large enterprises, and the five signs of theatre with one example each. |
| 10 min | Read the draft charter ROLE-HM-CEO-01 and the table of decision classes; compare what Friedrich Albrecht controls with what the regional director of Nordvik Region may set. |
| 25 min | Exercise: review an adoption target using the chapter's practical guide. |
| 10 min | Quiz and a round on which sign of theatre participants have seen most often. |
Discussion
- The regional director of Nordvik cannot set adoption targets for politically governed services. What does that constraint do to the pace of adoption, and is there an equivalent limit on a chief executive in your sector?
- The test of an input count is whether anyone can say what would be different for a customer, a citizen or an employee if the figure doubled. Apply the test to one figure your leadership reports.
- A chief executive on a full day is under the multiple-task load in which automation bias occurs in experts. What would unaided preparation once a quarter look like for your most senior leader?
Written exercise
Exercise · 25 minutes
Review an adoption target
Take an AI adoption target from your own organisation, or Hansa Mutual's target of 70 per cent weekly use of the embedded assistants. Following the practical guide, record the target as worded; the dashboard definition of the measure; the logs or sampling behind it; the date of the last independent check and therefore the evidence age; and which managers' objectives mention the target. State what behaviour the target rewards that was not intended. Then rewrite it as an outcome target with a named answerer, an independent reader, a date for the first check and a condition under which the organisation slows down.
Deliverable: A one-page review of the target with evidence age and incentive analysis, and a rewritten outcome target with answerer and slow-down condition.
Self-test
Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.
What makes a statement about AI a thesis and not a slogan, according to the chapter?
Show the answer
C. It can be wrong: it names an outcome and says when the organisation will stop
The example thesis expects AI to shorten the median time to first contact in claims without raising the share of decisions corrected on appeal, and says the organisation will stop if it does.What remedy does the draft charter ROLE-HM-CEO-01 propose for the adoption dashboard that counted logins?
Show the answer
B. Move the target from an input to an outcome, with an evidence age and an independent check by the chief risk officer
The remedy is an outcome target, an evidence age on every adoption claim, an independent check by the chief risk officer and the chief executive as the named answerer for the claim.For decisions of the strategic, structural, risk or crisis classes, what is the chief executive's rule about dissent?
Show the answer
A. The dissent is written by the person who dissents, not extracted by the assistant
A summary that frames a disagreement one way is a decision about the framing. The temptation to let the assistant carry the contested point is countered by having the dissenter write the dissent.