AI Leader · Module 6 · The Leader as a Person

The Leader's Own Mind: Cognitive Offloading, Power, Loneliness and Wellbeing

The lesson treats the leader as a person whose attention, memory and confidence are changed by daily tools. Participants distinguish cognitive offloading from overreliance, check the popular view of the lonely leader against the one study the chapter could open, examine the assistant as confidant where power, sycophancy and preference for agreement meet, and write a personal practice plan with first views, dark days, independent sources and a named partner.

Lesson 28 of 33Chapter 2875 minutes

Read the chapterThe whitepaperThe slides

All courses / AI Leader / Module 6 / Chapter 28

Learning objectives

After the lesson the participant can:

Key concepts

Cognitive offloading
In Risko and Gilbert's definition, the use of physical action to alter the information-processing requirements of a task so as to reduce cognitive demand. It is not a pathology: a notebook, a calendar and a secretary are offloading.
Overreliance
Offloading becomes overreliance when the person stops checking what is offloaded. Complacency occurs under multiple-task load, which is the leader's ordinary condition, and both complacency and automation bias occur in experts as well as novices.
The assistant as confidant
Three findings meet: greater power is associated with less advice taking through confidence; assistants trained with human feedback tend to agree with the user; and people prefer and trust the agreeing answer. The combination is the book's own inference.
First view
Before opening the briefing on a consequential decision, the leader writes ten lines or fewer: the choice leaned towards, the two facts it rests on and what would change their mind. It is filed with the decision record and not shown to the assistant.
Dark day
A scheduled period in which the leader works with the assistants off, reads a sample of sources and exercises the independent channels. With first views it forms a practice plan whose record is held by a partner with standing to disagree.

Interactive exercises

Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.

Interactive exercise 1 · Match

Studies behind the leader's own mind

Match each study the chapter cites to what it found or defined. None of them sampled executives.

Interactive exercise 2 · Scenario

The assistant as confidant

Apply the chapter's practice for keeping judgement in use.

Teaching plan

15 minLecture on offloading and overreliance, with the reminder that no study cited sampled executives and that the pattern in other populations is consistent and conditional.
15 minThe teacher presents the evidence on loneliness, power and advice taking, sycophancy and dependence; participants reflect privately on what they last asked an assistant that they would not ask a colleague.
10 minPractice: each participant writes a first view on a real pending decision in ten lines, before any briefing is consulted.
25 minExercise: write a personal practice plan for two quarters.
10 minQuiz and comparison of the two partners in the chapter: an HR director at Nordvik and the chair of the supervisory board at Hansa.

Discussion

  1. In one experiment, interaction with a sycophantic model increased conviction of being in the right and participants rated those responses higher in quality. What does that imply for a senior leader who tests an argument alone with an assistant?
  2. Hansa's chief executive is paired with the chair of the supervisory board, who is a supervisor and not a peer. What does that choice cost, and what does it gain compared with a peer partner?
  3. The plan's measures are counts of practice, and the partner does not read assistant usage logs or performance ratings. Why does the chapter draw that line?

Written exercise

Exercise · 25 minutes

A personal practice plan

Write a practice plan for your own leadership role for the next two quarters, in the form of CMP-NR-2029-21. Name the decision classes in which you will write a first view before opening any briefing, and where the first views are filed. Fix one dark day per quarter: which assistants are off, which sources you will read at random, and which independent channels you will exercise, such as a standing conversation with people close to the work. Choose a partner, state what the partner reads and does not read, how often you meet, and that the partner may ask you to explain one decision without the assistant. State who is informed that the plan exists and what the record excludes.

Deliverable: A one-page practice plan with first-view classes, two dated dark days, independent channels, a named partner and the record's exclusions.

Self-test

Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.

  1. What did the one study on loneliness that the chapter could open find about managers?

    Show the answer

    D. Loneliness did not differ by managerial status
    Wright's three studies found managers no more and no less lonely than non-managers. They predate broad AI use, and the chapter takes them as a reason not to assume every leader is isolated.

  2. What did See and colleagues find about power and advice?

    Show the answer

    B. Power and advice taking were negatively related, mediated by confidence in one's own judgement
    Across four studies, more power meant less advice taking through greater confidence, and in the last study higher-power participants were less accurate. Combined with agreeable assistants, this is the chapter's sharpest risk.

  3. On which decisions does the chapter say the first view applies?

    Show the answer

    A. Decision classes where the leader's judgement is the substance, such as strategic, risk and people decisions
    The first view costs ten to fifteen minutes and rehearses the Explain test. It is reserved for the classes where judgement is the substance and is not required for every routine approval.