AI Leader · Module 1 · The Leadership Role in Question

What Leaders Did Before: Hierarchy, Management Science, Agile and Servant Leadership

The lesson reads the history of leadership as a baseline for change. Bureaucracy, scientific management, human relations, managerial roles and contingency, servant and transformational leadership, and agile are treated as answers to different scarcities, and the observational studies of what managers actually do correct common assumptions. Participants learn to read an existing structure as a fossil record and to classify leadership practices by the model they come from and by whether they carry information or establish an answerer.

Lesson 2 of 33Chapter 275 minutes

Read the chapterThe whitepaperThe slides

All courses / AI Leader / Module 1 / Chapter 2

Learning objectives

After the lesson the participant can:

Key concepts

Scarcity behind the shape
The book's own reading of the lineage: each leadership model answered something scarce, namely predictability, efficient effort, motivation and attention, information and fit, purpose and trust, or coordination speed. Four were relieved with layers, rules, reports and meetings; two only by relationships.
Structure as a fossil record
A delegation order, an authority matrix, a span of control or a job description carries the assumptions of the model that produced it. An organisation cannot redesign what it cannot read, which is why the history is useful before deciding what AI should change.
Relocated control
Barker's study of one manufacturing company found that after supervisors were removed, norms set by self-managing teams became a form of control more powerful and less visible than before. Removing a layer does not remove the function of control; it relocates it.
Role charter as code
A role written against the five leadership functions, stating decision rights, ceilings for AI and the tests of answerability, in contrast to a job description that lists routing and controlling tasks. The chapter's first illustration is ROLE-NR-MGR-01 for a home-care unit manager.
Practice inventory
A list of the leadership practices an organisation already has, each with its lineage, the scarcity it answered, whether it carries information, whether it establishes an answerer, where AI touches it, who checks it and an evidence date.

Interactive exercises

Do them here and get feedback at once. Choose a card and then where it belongs, or drag it.

Interactive exercise 1 · Match

Leadership models and their scarcities

Match each leadership model in the chapter's lineage to the scarcity it answered.

Interactive exercise 2 · Sort

Job description or charter as code

Sort each line by where the chapter places it: in the 2019 job description of the Strandvik unit manager or in the charter extract ROLE-NR-MGR-01.

Teaching plan

20 minLecture with a timeline on the board: the six models, the scarcity each answered, and the caution about the Hawthorne lore after the reanalysis by Levitt and List.
10 minThe teacher presents what Mintzberg observed in five chief executives: brevity, variety, fragmentation and a preference for spoken contact; participants compare this with their own week.
10 minParticipants read the 2019 job description of the Strandvik unit manager and the charter extract ROLE-NR-MGR-01 side by side and mark what the first leaves out.
25 minExercise: groups classify leadership practices in a practice inventory.
10 minQuiz and plenary on which practices could be unbundled and which establish an answerer.

Discussion

  1. Both example organisations cut a layer that was read as a router and turned out also to be a school and an anchor of local knowledge. How would you find out what a layer does before it is removed?
  2. Servant and transformational leadership do not depend on how information moves. What does that imply for leaders whose practice has consisted mainly of routing?
  3. Which documents in your organisation still carry the assumptions of bureaucracy or scientific management, and which of those assumptions would you keep on purpose?

Written exercise

Exercise · 25 minutes

Classify inherited leadership practices

Work in groups of three. Take six leadership practices from your own organisation, or from Nordvik Region and Hansa Mutual as the chapter describes them, for example the monthly unit report, the unit meeting, appraisal, the budget follow-up, the delegation order and the product team's planning meeting. For each practice record the lineage it belongs to, the scarcity it answered, whether it carries information, whether it establishes an answerer, where AI already touches it and in which usage mode, who checks the result, and an evidence date. Conclude with which practices could be unbundled and which must stay with a named person.

Deliverable: A practice inventory of six entries in the chapter's format, with a two-sentence conclusion on what to unbundle and what to keep.

Self-test

Choose an answer to see whether it is right, or open the answer below each question.

  1. What is the chapter's limited conclusion about the Hawthorne effect?

    Show the answer

    C. The textbook version is not established by the original experiments; the school's broader claim rests on other evidence
    Levitt and List recovered the illumination data and did not find the pattern retold for decades. A later reanalysis disputes details, so the chapter concludes only that the textbook version is not established there.

  2. Which scarcities does the chapter say generative AI is most likely to relieve in the leader's work?

    Show the answer

    D. Predictability, efficiency of effort, information and coordination speed
    These four were relieved with layers, rules, reports and meetings, so the routing and summarising part of the role is expected to shrink. Motivation and attention, and purpose and trust, were relieved only by relationships.

  3. What does the chapter say the 2019 job description of the Strandvik unit manager mostly describes?

    Show the answer

    A. The work of a router and a controller: allocate, report, pass on, follow up, ensure
    The description lists what can be counted and assigned, as documents shaped by the bureaucratic and scientific lineages do. Coaching, upward representation and judgement are missing or implied, which the charter as code corrects.